Inspired by Libertarianism, Republicans and the Tea Party Choose Short-Sighted Greed Over Long-Term Self-Interest

http://politics2100.wordpress.com/2010/10/17/greed/

In this blog, I have been defining the 30 year experiment of the New Right as being largely libertarian with regard to its political appeals, theory of how society works, and attitudes toward government and taxation.  To be fair, I have pointed out that the Republicans’ agenda includes two other potentially conflicting influences, social conservatism and support for an interventionist national security state.  I have chosen libertarianism as the dominant trend of the three in part because it is the most all-inclusive and influential in the area of economic policy and politics.  In this post, I will argue that Republican-libertarian/Tea Party politics and policy are based on short-sighted greed, which is a moral accusation that is extremely obvious yet has not been spoken of as such in the public sphere.

It is surprising that after a monumental economic slump caused in part by Republican pro-greed policy, that the same group committed to short-sighted greed may make substantial electoral gains in November against President Obama and the Democrats.   The Democrats are relatively speaking more committed to our long-term self-interest as a nation, though have made some deeply problematic policy suggestions and political strategy.  They have proposed and passed laws which are cumbersome and sometimes wrong-headed (I’m thinking about the health care bill).  The Democrats have stumbled badly in communicating their intents and commitment to a sustainable American prosperity.  However the Democrats are not so exclusively beholden to irrationality and short-sighted greed as the Republicans who are standing for office or campaigning for re-election.

The substantial imperfections of the Democrats pale in comparison to the callous disregard for the welfare of the American people of the Republican Party, some of whom are now campaigning to return America to the 18^th or 19^th Centuries.  Recently some “Tea Party” candidates have been campaigning against public education.   For their mistakes, the Democrats deserve to have their feet held to the fire but, even more, the Republicans do not deserve to be rewarded for their insanity and sheer stupidity.  Thus electing Democrats and challenging them in 2012 primaries would send the right message (even challenging the President in a primary makes sense) rather than switching over to the Party that brought us to ruin and doesn’t care.  Though the timidity and cluelessness of some Democrats is maddening, they are not as blind and morally bankrupt as their Republican opponents, in a vast majority of cases.